Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 193
Michael Gorbey v. Harold Clarke
as 21-6654
Respondent / Appellee: HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Petitioner / Appellant: MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Michael Owl Feather-Gorbey v. NFN NLN, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-10863
Plaintiff / Appellant: Michael S. Owl Feather-Gorbey, also known as Michael S. Gorbey
Defendant / Appellee: NFN NLN, Designation Staff, NFN NLN, Administrator of Designations and U.S. Attorney General, United States
Michael Gorbey v. Mohamed Mubarek
as 20-6764
Defendant / Appellee: MOHAMED MUBAREK, Doctor, TOM GERA, P.A., THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Owl Feather-Gorbey v. NLN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv01311
Plaintiff: Michael S. Owl Feather-Gorbey and Michael S Gorbey
Defendant: US Attorney General and NFN NLN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Michael OwlFeather-Gorbey v. Warden We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-6761
Respondent / Appellee: WARDEN, FCI Cumberland
Petitioner / Appellant: MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Michael Gorbey v. Mohamed Mubarek
as 19-7767
Defendant / Appellee: NURSE VANMETER, MOHAMED MUBAREK, Doctor, TOM GERA, PA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Michael Gorbey v. Revera
as 19-7457
Defendant / Appellee: D. DEURR, S. EIRICH and MS. REVERA, Assistant Warden
Plaintiff / Appellant: MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Michael Gorbey v. Harold Clarke
as 19-7451
Respondent / Appellee: HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Petitioner / Appellant: MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Michael Gorbey v. D. Huff
as 19-7468
Defendant / Appellee: D. HUFF and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Plaintiff / Appellant: MICHAEL S. GORBEY, a/k/a Michael S. Owlfeather-Gorbey
Michael Gorbey v. Warden
as 19-7445
Respondent / Appellee: WARDEN
Petitioner / Appellant: MICHAEL S. GORBEY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?