Cases 61 - 70 of 786
Justice v. LHC Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02584
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey D. Justice, II
Defendant:
LHC Group, Inc., Keith G. Myers, Monica F. Azare and others
Schuppert v. LHC Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02634
Plaintiff:
David Schuppert
Defendant:
LHC Group, Inc., Keith G. Myers, Monica F. Azare and others
Johnson v. Richland County Jail et al
as 9:2022cv00475
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Richland County Jail, Christopher Blunk, James Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stein v. LHC Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03551
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Defendant:
LHC Group, Inc., Keith G. Myers, Monica F. Azare and others
Gamble v. LHC Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03742
Plaintiff:
Corinne Gamble
Defendant:
LHC Group, Inc., Keith G. Myers, Monica F. Azare and others
Goodman v. LHC Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03664
Plaintiff:
Jerry Goodman
Defendant:
LHC Group, Inc., Keith G. Myers, Monica F. Azare and others
Able et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2022cv02872
Plaintiff:
Luke Able, Gilbert Ackerson, Destiny Alger and others
Defendant:
3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co), AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
Sabet v. Advisory Committee on Rules of Civil Procedures et al
as 1:2022cv02441
Plaintiff:
Samuel A. Sabet
Defendant:
Advisory Committee on Rules of Civil Procedures and Scott Myers, Esq.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ss Fed. Question: Constitutionality of State Statutes
Megginson v. The Bridge Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv09626
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Megginson
Defendant:
The Bridge Inc., Danniella Belle, Makiala Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Atas v. The New York Times Company et al
as 1:2022cv00853
Plaintiff:
Nadire Atas
Defendant:
The New York Times Company, Dean Baquet, Ellen Pollock and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
