Cases 61 - 70 of 139
FREEMAN v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 1:2018cv00046
Plaintiff:
TERESA ANN FREEMAN
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP and MCKESSON CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BLACKMON v. COHEN et al
as 1:2017cv00890
Plaintiff:
SHARON RENEA BLACKMON
Defendant:
MANDY COHEN, PATRICIA GARCIA, CLAUDIA HORN and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
LILLEY v. LOFLIN et al
as 1:2017cv00857
Plaintiff:
CHESTER LILLEY
Defendant:
D. LOFLIN, D. MATEKIO, CALIFF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Myers et al v. Beverly et al
as 5:2017cv00435
Plaintiff:
Darel Myers , Janet Myers , House of Lights, Inc. Pension Plan and Trust and others
Defendant:
Thomas E Beverly and Lynn Beverly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
FIORE v. MYERS et al
as 1:2017cv00747
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JOSEPH FIORE, II
Defendant:
MYERS and GREESON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOLLAND V. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL.
as 1:2017cv00710
Plaintiff:
ANITA ROCHELLE HOLLAND
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY , ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP and MCKESSON CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robinson v. Herring et al
as 3:2017cv00403
Plaintiff:
Rachad Lamar Robinson
Defendant:
John Herring, FNU Myers, FNU Cline and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00369
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
BROWN v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 1:2017cv00554
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM OTIS JAMES BROWN
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL, INC. and OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MYERS v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2017cv00406
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Plaintiff:
BRETT MYERS
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
