Cases 61 - 70 of 440
Michael D. Simpson v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2021cv04403
Plaintiff:
Michael D Simpson, individually and as successor-in-interest to JAMAAL MICHAEL SIMPSON, deceased
Defendant:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, LOS ANGELES COUNTY ALEX VILLANUEVA and Does 1 to 50 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Giles v. San Joaquin Valley Rehabilitation Hospital et al
as 1:2021cv00732
Defendant:
Mary Jo Jacobson, Connie Pierce, Vibra Healthcare and others
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Giles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Michael D. Early v. Byron Keith Moles et al
as 2:2021mc00373
Defendant:
Santa Maria Brewing Co., Inc. and Byron Keith Moles
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Early
Bonilla v. Dembin et al
as 3:2021cv00396
Defendant:
Judge Michael S. Berg, Judge Larry Alan Burns, Judge Michael D. Dembin and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Carlisle v. NantKwest, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00304
Defendant:
Michael D. Blaszyk, NantKwest, Inc., Patrick Soon-Shiong and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Carlisle
Weiss v. Nantkwest, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00280
Defendant:
Michael D. Blaszyk, Nantkwest, Inc., Patrick Soon-Shiong and others
Plaintiff:
Annie Weiss
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv00242
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michael D. Ward v. Brian Cates
as 2:2021cv01019
Petitioner:
Dr. Michael D. Ward
Respondent:
Brian Cates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Andrew Garcia v. Amazon.com Services LLC et al
as 2:2021cv00604
Plaintiff:
Andrew Garcia
Defendant:
Amazon.com Services LLC dba Amazon Flex, DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, Michael D. Deal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
