Cases 61 - 70 of 595
Thornton v. Mobile County D.A. et al
as 1:2022cv00441
Plaintiff:
Dominique L. Thornton
Defendant:
Mobile County D.A., Mobile County Metro Jail, Fox 10 News and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randles v. FBI of Mobile AL
as 1:2022cv00405
Plaintiff:
Alexander Randles
Defendant:
FBI of Mobile AL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00594
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00386
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mobile Baykeeper, Inc. v. Alabama Power Company
as 1:2022cv00382
Plaintiff:
Mobile Baykeeper, Inc.
Defendant:
Alabama Power Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Resource & Recovery Act
Caudle v. AT&T Inc et al
as 5:2022cv01220
Plaintiff:
Allen Caudle
Defendant:
AT&T Inc, T Mobile AG, Apple Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Pettway v. Pettway et al
as 1:2022cv00371
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Pettway
Defendant:
Jamal Pettway, Tabitha Lamar, Rodrick Sheldton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Howard-Hunt v. Mobile Infirmary Hospital
as 1:2022cv00319
Plaintiff:
Washonda J. Howard-Hunt
Defendant:
Mobile Infirmary Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Howard-Hunt v. Mobile County Health Department
as 1:2022cv00307
Plaintiff:
Washonda J. Howard-Hunt
Defendant:
Mobile County Health Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Cooley v. Sam Cochran
as 1:2022cv00297
Petitioner:
Jesse Cooley, Jr.
Respondent:
Mobile Metro Jail and Sam Cochran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
