Cases 61 - 70 of 70
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00657
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Gutenkauf v. Tempe, City of et al
as 2:2010cv02129
Plaintiff:
Daniel Arthur Gutenkauf
Defendant:
Tempe, City of, Hugh Hallman, Unknown Hallman and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Navarro-Hill v. United States of America
as 4:2010cv00037
Petitioner:
Javier Gerardo Navarro-Hill
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Soliz v. Arizona Corrections, Department of et al
as 2:2009cv01555
Plaintiff:
Frank Holquin Soliz, IV
Defendant:
Arizona Corrections, Department of, Unknown Parties, Curran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Navarro et al v. Robert Bosch LLC et al
as 2:2009cv01532
Plaintiff:
Obdulia Navarro and Gerardo Navarro
Defendant:
Robert Bosch LLC, Robert Bosch GmbH, Robert Bosch Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Heredia-Navarro v. Immigration Customs Enforcement
as 2:2009cv00693
Plaintiff:
Rigoberto Heredia-Navarro
Defendant:
Immigration Customs Enforcement
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Zuniga-Navarro v. United States of America
as 2:2008cv01848
Petitioner:
Jose Ricardo Zuniga-Navarro
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Navarro v. Schriro et al
as 2:2008cv00642
Petitioner:
Mercedes Navarro
Respondent:
Dora Schriro and Arizona Attorney General, State of
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Heredia-Navarro v. United States of America
as 2:2007cv01336
Plaintiff:
Rigoberto Heredia-Navarro
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Navarro v. Schriro et al
as 2:2007cv01221
Petitioner:
Chavel R Navarro
Respondent:
Dora Schriro, Terry Goddard and Andrew P Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
