Cases 61 - 70 of 210
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01817
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. NGUYEN et al
as 3:2022mc00001
In Re:
ASSETS
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Claimant:
MARY NGUYEN and RANKO LUNIC
Nguyen v. H & M Hennes & Mauritz, LP
as 1:2022cv00987
Plaintiff:
Sandy Nguyen
Defendant:
H & M Hennes & Mauritz, LP, H & M Hennes & Mauritz GBC AB, LLC, Keith Dent and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Roberts v. Pontes et al
as 2:2022cv00030
Plaintiff:
Nathan Leon Roberts
Defendant:
Joe Pontes, W. Green, Amy S. Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Funds Seized from JP Morgan Chase Acct. Ending in 0399 and Wells Fargo Acct. Ending in 9701
as 4:2021cv00349
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Funds Seized from JP Morgan Chase Acct. Ending in 0399 and Wells Fargo Acct. Ending in 9701
Claimant:
Thanh Nguyen
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv04832
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00247
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv04770
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Nguyen v. Huynh et al
as 1:2021cv04638
Plaintiff:
Hong M Nguyen
Defendant:
Farmers Insurance Agent Holley Huynh and Farmers Insurance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
