Cases 61 - 70 of 98
Amalia et al v. Pfizer, Inc.
as 1:2013cv00365
Plaintiff:
Amalia E. Peterson and William F. Peterson
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Peterson v. United States of America
as 2:2013cv02500
Petitioner:
Courtney M. Peterson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Saults v. Midland Funding, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv00003
Plaintiff:
Rosalie Saults
Defendant:
Midland Funding, LLC, Midland Credit Management, Inc., Finkelstein, Kern, Steinberg & Cunningham, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Peterson v. Colson
as 2:2012cv03082
Petitioner:
Johnny J. Peterson
Respondent:
Roland Colson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peterson v. Colson
as 3:2012cv01297
Petitioner:
Johnny J. Peterson
Respondent:
Roland Colson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reeves et al v. Haslam et al
as 1:2012cv01254
Plaintiff:
Adrian Reeves and Sherod Peterson
Defendant:
Bill Haslam and David Woolfork
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peterson et al v. Haslam et al
as 1:2012cv01253
Plaintiff:
Sherod Peterson and Adrian Reeves
Defendant:
Bill Haslam and David Woolfork
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burgess et al v. Knox County Schools et al
as 3:2012cv00557
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Burgess and Kelly Burgess
Defendant:
Knox County Schools , Richard Ward and Susan E. Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Laurence v. Peterson
as 3:2012cv00992
Plaintiff:
Nanette Laurence
Defendant:
Kevin Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
