Cases 61 - 70 of 2,173
Armendariz Perez v. Warden Mr. Smith
as 4:2023cv01168
Petitioner:
Irene Armendariz Perez
Respondent:
Warden Mr. Smith and Michael Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Trujillo et al v. Deglandon et al
as 9:2023cv00191
Plaintiff:
Alejandrina Perez Trujilo and Jacinto De La Garza Valdez
Defendant:
Cody Deglandon, Thomas Austin, Danna Warren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rios v. Perez et al
as 5:2023cv01310
Plaintiff:
Marc Rios and Marcos Rios
Defendant:
Christopher Perez, Amanda Lara, Joe Flores and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Perez et al v. General Motors, LLC
as 1:2023cv01269
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Perez and Adriana Briseno
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
PennyMac Loan Services, LLC v. Perez
as 2:2023cv00160
Plaintiff:
PennyMac Loan Services, LLC
Defendant:
Emma Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Demison v. Collier et al
as 9:2023cv00177
Plaintiff:
Robert Demison, III
Defendant:
Brain Collier, Lorie Davis, William Stephens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02445
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Armendariz Perez v. Warden Mr. Smith
as 3:2023cv00405
Plaintiff:
Irene Armendariz Perez
Defendant:
Warden Mr. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Perez Dowling v. Geico.com et al
as 1:2023cv01256
Plaintiff:
Angela D Perez Dowling and Angela D Dowling
Defendant:
Geico.com, Amici.com, Amazon.com and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
