Cases 61 - 70 of 320
Peterson v. Johnston & Rhodes Bluestone Co
as 3:2018cv02222
Counter Plaintiff:
Johnston & Rhodes Bluestone Co
Plaintiff:
Hazel V. Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PETERSON et al v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2018cv03690
Plaintiff:
EDWARD H. PETERSON and PATRICIA M. PETERSON
Defendant:
JACOB NATHANIEL DAVIS and LEN THE PLUMBER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ROMERO et al v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2003cv06872
Plaintiff:
GENE R. ROMERO, JAMES T. BEVER, ROGER T. BOYD and others
Defendant:
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 633 Job Discrimination (Age)
VIDA v. ABEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv62874
Defendant:
SOUTHWESTERN PORTLAND CEMENT, UNION CARBIDE CORP., ALTA BUILDING MATERIAL CO. and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM VIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SIMMONS v. ALLEGHENY HEALTH NET et al
as 2:2018cv00825
Plaintiff:
ALVIN R. SIMMONS, JR.
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY HEALTH NET, JASMINE PETERSON and AMY MCCANN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
SPEARMAN v. SOTELLO et al
as 2:2018cv02595
Plaintiff:
MELVIN SPEARMAN
Defendant:
ANGELIQUE SOTELLO, ALONZO DAWSON, MELANIE BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PETERSON v. PENNROSE PROPERTIES, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv00764
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA PETERSON
Defendant:
PENNROSE PROPERTIES, LLC , LAUREL ESTATES HOUSING, L.P. , TINA GORDON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
SIMMONS v. ALLEGHENY HEALTH NETWORK et al
as 2:2018cv00753
Plaintiff:
ALVIN R. SIMMONS, JR.
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY HEALTH NETWORK and JASMINE PETERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Harvey et al v. Cline et al
as 3:2018cv00939
Plaintiff:
Vincent Harvey and Richard Hawkins
Defendant:
D. Cline, Tammy Ferguson, PA Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00581
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
