Cases 61 - 70 of 101
ARMSTRONG et al v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2010cv01246
Plaintiff:
GALEN ARMSTRONG , TIM BARTHELMES , MATT BARTKO and others
Defendant:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH, NATHAN HARPER, PAUL DONALDSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PITTMAN et al v. AC&S, INC.
as 2:2010cv79014
Plaintiff:
FRED PITTMAN and LAURIE E. PITTMAN
Defendant:
AC&S, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PITTMAN et al v. EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv80401
Plaintiff:
FRANK PITTMAN and EDITH PITTMAN
Defendant:
EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC., FLINTKOTE, H.K. PORTER COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pittman v. Chekunov et al
as 1:2010cv01674
Plaintiff:
Danny Pittman
Defendant:
Arthur Chekunov, Arthur Xpress, Inc., Arthur Xpress, Inc./Fleet Car and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PITTMAN v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv72215
Plaintiff:
IRVIN S. PITTMAN
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PITTMAN v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv72216
Plaintiff:
JULIUS O. PITTMAN
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pittman v. Bledsoe et al
as 3:2010cv00788
Petitioner:
Darnell Pittman, Sr.
Respondent:
B.A. Bledsoe, T Brouse, P Lizardi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
PITTMAN v. AC AND S, INC.(ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY) et al
as 2:2010cv62416
Plaintiff:
DAVID A. PITTMAN
Defendant:
AC AND S, INC.(ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY), ASBESTOSPRAY CORP., FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PITTMAN et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv64629
Plaintiff:
IRA LEWIS PITTMAN, SR and FAY AYERS PITTMAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY , AW CHESTERTON COMPANY , ALFA LAVAL INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pittman v. Bledsoe et al
as 3:2010cv00748
Petitioner:
Darnell Pittman, Sr.
Respondent:
B.A. Bledsoe, F. Gambone, C. Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
