Cases 61 - 70 of 3,069
Raynor God v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
as 2:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
Gilbert R. Raynor God
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Dedes v. Paige et al
as 3:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
Christos D. Dedes
Defendant:
Rosewell Paige, John H. O'Brion, Jr., James Watson Morris, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Ra v. Anderson et al
as 7:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
Ashann Ra and Ashaun Ra
Defendant:
David E. Anderson, Lt. J.B. Robinson, Lt. R. Hickman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilkins et al v. Rasnake et al
as 7:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Andre Curtis Wilkins
Defendant:
Investigator K. Rasnake, Unit Manager C. Dye, Warden Isreal D. Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burrell v. Hawks et al
as 7:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
Joel Aaron Burrell
Defendant:
RN A. Hawks, A. Taylor, RN M. Reavis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Porter v. Lampman et al
as 1:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Tremaine Porter
Defendant:
P. Lampman, R. Langford and Joshua Branch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Potvin v. The Hartford et al
as 2:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Andrew R Potvin
Defendant:
The Hartford and H.L. Commercial Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00141
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Smith v. Duffield Jail et al
as 7:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Samuel Smith
Defendant:
Duffield Jail, Chaplain R. Adams, Lt. R. Templeton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
