Cases 61 - 70 of 439
Betani #217768 v. Shinn et al
as 3:2022cv08024
Plaintiff:
Duran Betani
Defendant:
David Shinn, M Allred, Unknown Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams #124345 v. Yuma, County of et al
as 2:2022cv00154
Plaintiff:
DaJuan Torrell Williams
Defendant:
Yuma, County of, Bianca Acosta, Julian Aguayo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bishop v. Ramirez
as 2:2022cv00130
Plaintiff:
Park V Bishop, Jr.
Defendant:
John Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Ramirez v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2021cv02163
Plaintiff:
Amayrani Ramirez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Ramirez v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2021cv01736
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Geraldine Ramirez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01868
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Rivero et al v. Kan et al
as 2:2021cv01660
Plaintiff:
Orbelio Diaz Rivero, Yoandry Pereira Ruiz and Dayana Ramirez Perez
Defendant:
Xiangyu Kan wife doing business as KF Transportation Incorporated, Unknown Kan, FMCSA Motor Carrier a California Incorporation doing business as KF Transportation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01856
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Ramirez v. Ruboyianes et al
as 2:2021cv01517
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Ramirez
Defendant:
Victor Ruboyianes, David Shinn, M Castrejon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
