Cases 61 - 70 of 458
Berrios v. Kelly et al
as 1:2013cv06098
Plaintiff:
Orlando Berrios
Defendant:
Raymond Kelly, Gregory Tobin, Ronald Pererra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berrios v. Kelly et al
as 7:2013cv06098
Plaintiff:
Orlando Berrios
Defendant:
Raymond Kelly, Gregory Tobin, Ronald Pererra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berrios v. Kelly et al
as 1:2013cv06098
Plaintiff:
Orlando Berrios
Defendant:
Raymond Kelly, Gregory Tobin, Ronald Pererra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cancel v. Kelly et al
as 1:2013cv06007
Plaintiff:
Frankie Cancel
Defendant:
Raymond Kelly, John Doe, Christopher Caruso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv04632
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv05445
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Corton-Corchado et al v. The City Of New York , et al
as 1:2013cv05366
Plaintiff:
Carmen Corton-Corchado , Pascual Corchado , Kathylee Corton and others
Defendant:
The City Of New York, New York City Police Dept, Raymond Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tyler v. Rad et al
as 1:2013cv05319
Plaintiff:
Milo Tyler
Defendant:
Brian Rad, Raymond Kelly, Cyrus Vance, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyler v. Rad et al
as 7:2013cv05319
Plaintiff:
Milo Tyler
Defendant:
Brian Rao, Raymond Kelly, Cyrus Vance, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Troy v. City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv05082
Plaintiff:
Suzannah B. Troy
Defendant:
City of New York , Raymond Kelly , Campisi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
