Cases 61 - 70 of 1,329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00412
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Deleon v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01120
Plaintiff:
Richard Deleon
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Kinel v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01100
Plaintiff:
Richard Kinel
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
United States of America v. Sharpe et al
as 5:2023cv00353
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Richard T. Sharpe and Sherry J. Peele
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00349
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Foy v. Dioceses of Charlotte, North Carolina et al
as 3:2023cv00365
Plaintiff:
Richard C. Foy
Defendant:
Dioceses of Charlotte, North Carolina and Saint Mark Catholic Church
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Emke v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2023cv00098
Plaintiff:
Chad James Emke
Defendant:
State of North Carolina and Richard S. Holloway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Emke v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
Chad James Emke
Defendant:
State of North Carolina and Richard S. Holloway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cephas v. Holzapfel
as 5:2023hc02133
Petitioner:
Richard Cephas
Respondent:
Warden William Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Butler et al v. Americo Financial Life and Annuity Insurance Company et al
as 5:2023cv00325
Plaintiff:
Jason Richard Butler, Nicki Robert Butler and Jared Michael Butler
Defendant:
Americo Financial Life and Annuity Insurance Company and Americo Life, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
