Cases 61 - 70 of 496
Bouman v. County of San Diego et al
as 3:2023cv01648
Plaintiff:
Rob Bouman
Defendant:
County of San Diego and Does 1 through 25
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1988 Proceedings in Vindication of Civil Rights
(PC) Calderon v. Bonta et al
as 2:2023cv01687
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Calderon
Defendant:
Rob Bonta and P. Covello
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv04078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dominguez v. Abaci et al
as 3:2023cv03669
Plaintiff:
Elijah Dominguez
Defendant:
John Allan Abaci, Colantuono, Highsmith & Whatley, Rob Stanely Schroder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jane Doe v. Rob Bonta et al
as 8:2023cv01324
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
Attorney General Rob Bonta, Rob Bonta and Does 1 to 10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ricchio v. Core et al
as 3:2023cv01330
Petitioner:
Linda Elizabeth Ricchio
Respondent:
Jennifer Core and Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bonilla v. Alameda County District Attorney
as 4:2023cv03448
Petitioner:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Respondent:
Alameda County District Attorney, Warden Cueva and Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv05534
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Egan v. Weinreb et al
as 3:2023cv01307
Petitioner:
Michael P. Egan
Respondent:
Brad A. Weinreb and Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Antioch University v. Rob Bonta et al
as 2:2023cv05341
Plaintiff:
Antioch University
Defendant:
ROBERT ANDRES BONTA, Stewart Knox, Katrina Hagen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
