Cases 61 - 70 of 549
CARRAWAY-ROEBUCK v. WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2012cv00856
Plaintiff:
MARILYNN CARRAWAY-ROEBUCK
Defendant:
WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP , TIMOTHY NAULTY , CHARLES YUSKO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
JONIK et al v. HARLAN et al
as 2:2012cv03129
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN T. JONIK and DONNA JONIK
Defendant:
MICHAEL HARLAN , SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO. and SEARS HOLDINGS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GRAHAM v. SEARS et al
as 2:2012cv02824
Plaintiff:
MARLITA GRAHAM
Defendant:
SEARS , SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO. and SEARS HOLDINGS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BELL et al v. ARVIN MERITOR, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv60143
Plaintiff:
DONALD BELL and SUMIKO BELL
Defendant:
ARVIN MERITOR, INC., BORGWARNER MORSE TEC INC , BRIDGESTONE FIRESTONE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GREGORY et al v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & CO.
as 2:2012cv00284
Plaintiff:
KRISTINE GREGORY and BRADFORD E. GREGORY
Defendant:
SEARS, ROEBUCK & CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
VAZQUEZ v. SEARS et al
as 2:2012cv00765
Plaintiff:
ROSA VAZQUEZ
Defendant:
SEARS , SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO. and SEARS HOLDING CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GRAHAM et al v. SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO. et al
as 5:2012cv00747
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN J. GRAHAM and BARBARA C. GRAHAM
Defendant:
SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO. and ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WADDELL et al v. SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO. et al
as 2:2012cv00766
Plaintiff:
FRANCES WADDELL and RONALD WADDELL
Defendant:
SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO. and SEARS HOLDING CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WHITMAN et al v. SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO. et al
as 2:2012cv00072
Plaintiff:
GLEN WHITMAN and ANNA WHITMAN
Defendant:
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO. and FSA NETWORK, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
