Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 61 - 70 of 216
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv03463
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
RICO v. PREMIUM CASING, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv03434
Plaintiff: ROSARIO RICO
Defendant: PREMIUM CASING, LLC, HILLCREST FARMS, INC., HILLCREST FARMS PEAT MOSS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROSARIO v. BUCKS COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2017cv02169
Plaintiff: FRANK RODRIGUEZ ROSARIO
Defendant: BUCKS COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, JOHN DOE #1, JOHN DOE #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00770
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
COFRE v. NATIONWIDE PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSUANCE COMPANY et al
as 5:2017cv01905
Plaintiff: STEVEN R. COFRE
Defendant: NATIONWIDE PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSUANCE COMPANY and SARAH M. ROSARIO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
ROSARIO v. WEIRTON MEDICAL CENTER We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00085
Plaintiff: PATRICK ROSARIO, M.D.
Defendant: WEIRTON MEDICAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other
ROSARIO v. KUTA
as 3:2016cv00261
Petitioner: JUAN DIONISIO NOBA ROSARIO
Respondent: SEAN M. KUTA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ROSARIO v. USA
as 5:2016cv05129
Plaintiff: ANGEL ROSARIO
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Rosario-Torres v. Lane et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv01891
Petitioner: Jesus Rosario-Torres
Respondent: Jay Lane, PA State Attorney General and Sarah Ann Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ROSARIO v. KUTA
as 3:2016cv00201
Petitioner: REYNALDO ROSARIO
Respondent: S. M. KUTA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?