Cases 61 - 70 of 1,323
Smith v. Maddox et al
as 1:2023cv03454
Petitioner:
Stephenson Lamar Smith
Respondent:
Melody M. Maddox, A. Morrell, Andrea Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Griffith v. State of Georgia et al
as 3:2023cv00152
Plaintiff:
Lionel Joseph Griffith, Sr.
Defendant:
State of Georgia and Coweta County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
LEE v. REED et al
as 5:2023cv00314
Petitioner:
JAI DEVON LEE
Respondent:
AMANDA REED, DONALD CONEWAY, SR and JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03447
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
Griffin v. Woodruff
as 3:2023cv00145
Petitioner:
Travis Griffin, Sr.
Respondent:
James Woodruff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Whipple v. Paulding County Detention Center
as 4:2023cv00137
Plaintiff:
Desmond Lee Whipple, Sr.
Defendant:
Paulding County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHAPMAN SR v. SHAVERS et al
as 1:2023cv00143
Plaintiff:
TREVON D CHAPMAN SR
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN BRIAN SHAVERS, DEPUTY WARDEN SPANN, DEPUTY WARDEN OSBORNE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whipple v. Coastal State Prison
as 4:2023cv00200
Plaintiff:
Desmond Lee Whipple, Sr.
Defendant:
Coastal State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whipple v. Floyd County Jail
as 4:2023cv00173
Plaintiff:
Desmond Lee Whipple, Sr.
Defendant:
Floyd County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
