Cases 61 - 70 of 84
Castonguay v. Douglas County Correction Center
as 8:2009cv00251
Petitioner:
Paul Castonguay, Sr.
Respondent:
Douglas County Correction Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Epting v. Houston
as 4:2009cv03158
Petitioner:
John C. Epting, Sr.
Respondent:
Robert Houston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Castonguay v. Douglas County Corrections Medical Department
as 8:2009cv00232
Plaintiff:
Paul Castonguay, Sr.
Defendant:
Douglas County Corrections Medical Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Montes v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 8:2009cv00226
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Montes, Sr.
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Castonguay v. Douglas County Correction Center
as 8:2009cv00225
Plaintiff:
Paul Castonguay, Sr.
Defendant:
Douglas County Correction Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Castonguay v. State of Nebraska et al
as 8:2009cv00221
Plaintiff:
Paul Castonguay, Sr.
Defendant:
State of Nebraska and Douglas County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. Bunjer et al
as 8:2008cv00528
Plaintiff:
Maurice L. Coleman, Sr.
Defendant:
Kimberly Bunjer, Douglas County Prosecutors Office, Omaha Police Dept and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Securities America Financial Corporation v. Lucia
as 8:2008cv00515
Plaintiff:
Securities America Financial Corporation and Securities America Financial Corporation
Defendant:
Raymond L. Lucia, Sr. and Raymond J. Lucia, Sr
Cause Of Action: Diversity
World's Foremost Bank v. Keys
as 8:2008mc00096
Defendant:
Michael David Keys, Sr.
Plaintiff:
World's Foremost Bank
Coleman v. USA
as 8:2008cv00462
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Maurice L. Coleman, Sr.
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
