Cases 61 - 70 of 159
Carlos Gonzales v. Texas Bd of Pardons & Parole, et al
as 13-20718
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARLOS GONZALES
Defendant - Appellee:
TEXAS BOARD OF PARDONS & PAROLE, SILVA, Hearing Officer, LAUREN LUMAN, Parole Officer and others
Johnson v. Livingston et al
as 4:2013cv03406
Plaintiff:
Kevin Johnson
Respondent:
Brad Livingston, Regina Grimes, Stuart Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bates v. Brad Livingston,Exec. Dir. TDCJ
as 5:2013cv00969
Petitioner:
Darrell Eugene Bates
Defendant:
Stuart Jenkins, Donna Kay McKinney, William McManus and others
Respondent:
Director Brad Livingston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James Troyer, Jr. v. Stuart Jenkins, et al
as 13-41056
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES RICHARD TROYER, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
STUART JENKINS, Parole Director and WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Sharpless v. Jenkins
as 3:2013cv03982
Plaintiff:
Dennis Clay Sharpless
Defendant:
Stuart Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Eason v. Jenkins
as 4:2013cv00715
Plaintiff:
Sylvester Eason
Defendant:
Stuart Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ivie v. Abbott et al
as 3:2013cv03157
Plaintiff:
Danny Eugene Ivie
Defendant:
Greg Abbott, Rick Thaler and Stuart Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzales v. Texas Board of Pardons & Parole et al
as 4:2013cv02307
Petitioner:
Carlos Gonzales
Respondent:
Texas Board of Pardons & Parole, Silva, Lauren Luman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Etheridge v. Livingston et al
as 3:2013cv02678
Plaintiff:
Linda Etheridge
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Stuart Jenkins, Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Love v. Jenkins
as 1:2013cv00568
Respondent:
Stuart Jenkins
Petitioner:
Carlos Love
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
