Cases 61 - 70 of 137
LLOYD v. SCOTLAND COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2019cv00003
Defendant:
SCOTLAND COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, EARL HAYWOOD, JESSICA SADOVNIKOV and others
Plaintiff:
ANTWAN O'BRIAN LLOYD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLEY v. SCOTLAND DENTAL HEALTH CARE TWO DENTAL WORKERS et al
as 1:2018cv00939
Plaintiff:
ROGER EARL COLEY
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, ERIC A. HOOKS, DR. PAULA SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRAHAM v. CHAVIS et al
as 1:2018cv00697
Defendant:
SCOTLAND COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, OFC. BROCK, SGT LAUREL CHAVIS and others
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP JOHN GRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WASALAAM v. KERSEY et al
as 1:2018cv00314
Plaintiff:
SULYAMAN AL ISLAM WASALAAM
Defendant:
RALPH KERSEY, DEPARTMENT SCOTLAND COUNTY, DARYL WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WASALAAM v. SCOTLAND COUNTY DETENTION CENTER et al
as 1:2017cv00803
Plaintiff:
SULYAMAN AL ISLAM WASALAAM
Defendant:
SCOTLAND COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, STEPHANIE HUDSON and TUCK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WINSTON v. SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL
as 1:2017cv00422
Plaintiff:
FREDRICK WINSTON
Defendant:
SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLEY v. COOPER et al
as 1:2017cv00236
Plaintiff:
ROGER EARL COLEY
Defendant:
COOPER, SCOTLAND C/I, GEORGE T. SOLOMON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
as 1:2017cv00187
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY JONES
Defendant:
SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLEY v. DENTIST DEPARTMENT AT SCOTLAND CI
as 1:2017cv00159
Plaintiff:
ROGER EARL COLEY
Defendant:
DENTIST DEPARTMENT AT SCOTLAND CI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
as 1:2017cv00007
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY JONES
Defendant:
SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
