Cases 61 - 70 of 88
Demos v. U.S. Secretary of Defense et al
as 2:2013cv00088
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
US Secretary of Defense and Attorney General of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Demos v. US Secretary of Defense
as 2:2012cv02277
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Respondent:
US Secretary of Defense
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hanson v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv05995
Plaintiff:
Edgar L. Hanson
Defendant:
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and Kia Moua, D/B/A Assistant Secretary of Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Borer v. Secretary of the Treasury et al
as 3:2012cv05575
Plaintiff:
James F. Borer
Defendant:
Secretary of the Treasury and United States
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Lopez v. SSA et al
as 2:2012cv03077
Plaintiff:
Gilberto Lopez
Defendant:
SSA and Assistant Secretary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lopez v. DSHS et al
as 2:2012cv03053
Plaintiff:
Gilberto Lopez
Defendant:
- DSHS, John Clayton and Assistant Secretary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Chapel v. United States Secretary of the Treasury
as 3:2011cv05609
Plaintiff:
Richard Chapel
Defendant:
United States Secretary of the Treasury
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Judd v. Secretary of State of Washington et al
as 2:2011cv00214
Plaintiff:
Keith Russell Judd
Defendant:
Secretary of State of Washington and State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2011cv00682
Plaintiff:
Michael D Eisenhauer
Defendant:
Secretary of the Army
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Eisenhauer v. Secretary of the Army
as 3:2011cv05344
Plaintiff:
Michael D Eisenhauer
Defendant:
Secretary of the Army
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
