Cases 61 - 70 of 236
Johnson v. 3M Company et al
as 4:2020cv00008
Defendant:
Dorsett Industries, Inc., Tandus Centiva, Inc., E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company and others
Plaintiff:
Jarrod Johnson
Special Master:
Carlos A. Gonzalez
Petitioner:
The Carpet and Rug Institute
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
SHAW et al v. NOLEN
as 4:2019cv00204
Plaintiff:
Victoria Jenkins, Antonia Mabry, Denita Shaw and others
Defendant:
Michael Bradley Nolen and GA State Trooper MICHAEL BRADLEY NOLEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04388
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Shaw v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2019cv04368
Plaintiff:
Mary Kathleen Shaw
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security, Social Security Regional Administrator - NEF Only and Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00128
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00281
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mobley El v. Kemp et al
as 5:2019cv00035
Defendant:
Sgt Joyce, Lt. White, City of Douglas GA and others
Plaintiff:
Grand Shiek Amir Mobley El and Kenneth Mobley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daker v. Daker et al
as 1:2019cv01636
Defendant:
A.A. Butch Ayers, Jordan Cyphers, Charles M. Waters and others
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw Industries, Inc. v. Landsar Ranger, Inc.
as 4:2019cv00062
Defendant:
Landstar Ranger, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Shaw Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SHAW'S MENSWEAR v. DELONGY et al
as 5:2019cv00104
Defendant:
G C OF WINTER PARK INC, H CRAIG DELONGY, JCNAPLES INC and others
Plaintiff:
SHAW'S MENSWEAR INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
