Cases 61 - 70 of 108
Shelton v. Russell
as 6:2014cv03326
Petitioner:
Matthew C. Shelton
Respondent:
Terry Russell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Shelton v. Russell
as 4:2014cv01277
Petitioner:
Matthew C. Shelton
Respondent:
Terry Russell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Taylor et al v. Fresenius Medical Care North America, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv00980
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Taylor , Christopher Gavazzi , Cheryl Shelton and others
Defendant:
Fresenius Medical Care North America, Inc., Fresenius USA, Inc. , Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company et al v. Below et al
as 1:2014cv00048
Plaintiff:
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company and AMCO Insurance Company
Defendant:
David Below, Patrick Eggimann, Marcia Eggimann and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Shelton v. NCB Management Services, Inc.
as 4:2014cv00476
Plaintiff:
Stacey Shelton
Defendant:
NCB Management Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Walker v. Weber et al
as 4:2014cv00114
Plaintiff:
Andrew Walker
Defendant:
Michael Weber, Loughborough Auto Body, Inc., Bettye Battle-Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shelton v. Nester
as 4:2013cv01050
Petitioner:
Stanton Q. Shelton
Respondent:
Gerard Nester
Miscellaneou:
State of Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Colvin
as 4:2013cv00527
Plaintiff:
Shelton B. Brown, Jr.
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00765
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bradley v. Shelton et al
as 4:2013cv00319
Plaintiff:
David Bradley
Defendant:
William Shelton, Terri Lacey, Smoke Tobacco, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
