Cases 61 - 70 of 88
Crow v. United States Marshals Service et al
as 2:2014cv01476
Plaintiff:
Ivory Orey Crow
Defendant:
United States Marshals Service, John Brown, United States Attorney's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Onuigbo v. Wells Fargo Bank NA et al
as 2:2014cv00657
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank NA , Bank of America NA, JP Morgan Chase Bank NA and others
Plaintiff:
Chinedu Onuigbo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02335
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01772
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Castleman v. Department of Justice et al
as 4:2013cv00302
Plaintiff:
Daniel Scott Castleman
Defendant:
Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Executive Office for United States Attorneys and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Demos v. United States Secretary for the Department of Defense et al
as 4:2013cv00006
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos, Jr.
Respondent:
United States Secretary for the Department of Defense, United States Attorney General and United States Secretary of State
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cano-Chairez v. Ryan et al
as 4:2012cv00670
Petitioner:
Alvaro Cano-Chairez
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and United States Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01605
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00489
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00431
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
