Cases 61 - 70 of 179
ASH v. GADSDEN COUNTY SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS
as 4:2020cv00092
Plaintiff:
Freddie Ash
Defendant:
Gadsden County Supervisor of Elections
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
WILLIS v. CITY OF MIDWAY et al
as 4:2020cv00088
Defendant:
CITY OF MIDWAY and SHIRLEY KNIGHT, in her official capacity as SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS GADSDEN COUNTY
Plaintiff:
CHARLES WILLIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BRADLEY v. JACKSON et al
as 4:2020cv00084
Defendant:
RN SUPERVISOR BROWN, WALKER, Inmate Mr. JOHN BONAVATURE and others
Petitioner:
JAMES CLIFTION BRADLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prince v. Maguire et al
as 0:2020cv60010
Defendant:
Deputy Bradshaw, Brenda D. Forman, Officer Douglas E Szczepanik and others
Plaintiff:
Deshawn A. Prince
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barbati v. Flowers et al
as 6:2019cv02275
Defendant:
Unknown Supervisor and Virgil Flowers
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Barbati
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARTER v. WENGART et al
as 3:2019cv04828
Plaintiff:
JOHN CARY CARTER
Defendant:
WENGART, ASHLEY HARVEY, UNKNOWN AFRICAN AMERICAN MALE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Correctional Medical Group Companies et al
as 2:2019cv00841
Defendant:
FNU Vaughan, Sgt. Lepe, Michelle Olubode and others
Plaintiff:
Shermykael Jenkins, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonuso v. Highlands County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2019cv14343
Defendant:
Highlands County Sheriff's Office, Detective Steven D Ritenour and Supervisor Jamie D Davidson
Plaintiff:
Frank N. Bonuso
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Burt v. Doe et al
as 2:2019cv14347
Defendant:
Warden John Doe, Officer/Sergeant Jane Doe, T.A Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
John Thomas Burt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tribble v. Medical Director et al
as 3:2019cv00839
Defendant:
Medical Director, Supervisor Of Grievance System, Jpay Representative and others
Plaintiff:
Robert A Tribble
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
