Cases 61 - 70 of 670
BMO Harris Banks N.A. v. B T Auto Transport LLC et al
as 5:2022cv00298
Defendant:
B T Auto Transport LLC also known as B T Auto Transport LLC doing business as BT Exp Global Services, B T Auto Transport LLC, William Turner and others
Plaintiff:
BMO Harris Banks N.A. and BMO Harris Bank N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
AT&T Corp. v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
as 4:2022cv00079
Plaintiff:
AT&T Corp.
Defendant:
Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., LTD, Samsung International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Farris v. AT&T Corp.
as 4:2022cv00027
Plaintiff:
Bobbi Jo Farris
Defendant:
AT&T Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Thomas v. Louthan
as 6:2021cv00376
Petitioner:
Nor T. Thomas, Jr.
Respondent:
Scott Crow and David Louthan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
United States of America v. Smith et al
as 4:2021cv00534
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Lawrence J Smith, Lori T Smith and Lori Smith, DDS, Inc. P.C.
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Clervrain et al v. Treat et al
as 6:2021cv00365
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain and Francis Cobbina Osei-Fosu
Defendant:
Geg Treat, Greg McCortney, James Leewright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Solomon v. Natural Nails LLC et al
as 5:2021cv01154
Plaintiff:
Kaymeka Solomon
Defendant:
Natural Nails LLC, Van Ni Truong and Ngan T Nguyen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Armstrong v. Crow
as 4:2021cv00524
Petitioner:
Ryan T Armstrong
Respondent:
Scott Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas v. Louthan
as 4:2021cv00517
Petitioner:
Nor T Thomas, Jr
Respondent:
Scott Crow
Defendant:
David Louthan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Horton v. Hoffman et al
as 5:2021cv01098
Plaintiff:
John D Horton
Defendant:
Jared T Hoffman and Stephen Eschenbacher
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
