Cases 61 - 70 of 605
LOFSTAD et al v. RAIMONDO et al
as 3:2022cv07360
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND LOFSTAD and GUS LOVGREN
Defendant:
GINA RAIMONDO, JANET COIT and NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Alaska et al v. National Marine Fisheries Service
as 3:2022cv00249
Plaintiff:
Chief Ex Officer State of Alaska, North Slope Borough and State of Alaska
Defendant:
National Marine Fisheries Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Center for Biological Diversity, et al v. National Marine Fisheries Service, et al
as 22-5295
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Center for Biological Diversity, Defenders of Wildlife and Turtle Island Restoration Network
Defendant / Appellee:
National Marine Fisheries Service and Gina Raimondo, in her official capacity as Secretary of Commerce
Southern Cross Seafoods, LLC v. United States et al
as 1:2022cv00299
Plaintiff:
Southern Cross Seafoods, LLC
Defendant:
United States and National Marine Fisheries Service
White v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 3:2022cv06143
Plaintiff:
Sean K White
Defendant:
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Scott A Spellmon, National Marine Fisheries Service and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Strahan v. McKiernan, et al
as 22-1813
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD MAXIMUS STRAHAN, a/k/a Man Against Xtinction, a/k/a MAX
Defendant / Appellee:
MASSACHUSETTS DIVISION OF MARINE FISHERIES, JANET COIT, NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE and others
Center For Biological Diversity v. Raimondo et al
as 3:2022cv06566
Plaintiff:
Center For Biological Diversity
Defendant:
Gina Raimondo and National Marine Fisheries Service
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Maine Lobstermen's Association v. National Marine Fisheries Service, et al
as 22-5244
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Maine Lobstermen's Association
Not Yet Classified:
State of Maine Department of Marine Resources, Massachusetts Lobstermen's Association and District 4 Lodge of the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, Local Lodge 207
Defendant / Appellee:
National Marine Fisheries Service, Gina Raimondo, in her official capacity as Secretary of Commerce and Janet Coit, in her official capacity as Assistant Administrator for Fisheries
Intervenor / Appellee:
Conservation Law Foundation, Center for Biological Diversity and Defenders of Wildlife
Amicus Curiae:
State of New Hampshire and Maine State Chamber of Commerce
Maine Lobstermen's Association v. National Marine Fisheries Service, et al
as 22-5246
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Maine Lobstermen's Association
Not Yet Classified:
State of Maine Department of Marine Resources, District 4 Lodge of the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, Local Lodge 207 and Massachusetts Lobstermen's Association
Defendant / Appellee:
National Marine Fisheries Service, Gina Raimondo, in her official capacity as Secretary of Commerce and Janet Coit, in her official capacity as Assistant Administrator for Fisheries
Intervenor / Appellee:
Conservation Law Foundation, Center for Biological Diversity and Defenders of Wildlife
Amicus Curiae:
State of New Hampshire and Maine State Chamber of Commerce
Maine Lobstermen's Association v. National Marine Fisheries Service, et al
as 22-5245
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Maine Lobstermen's Association
Not Yet Classified:
State of Maine Department of Marine Resources, Massachusetts Lobstermen's Association and District 4 Lodge of the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, Local Lodge 207
Defendant / Appellee:
National Marine Fisheries Service, Gina Raimondo, in her official capacity as Secretary of Commerce and Janet Coit, in her official capacity as Assistant Administrator for Fisheries
Intervenor / Appellee:
Conservation Law Foundation, Center for Biological Diversity and Defenders of Wildlife
Amicus Curiae:
State of New Hampshire and Maine State Chamber of Commerce
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
