Cases 61 - 70 of 85
De La Fuente Manriquez, et al v. Phoenix, City of et al
as 2:2011cv01981
Defendant:
Phoenix, City of , Jeff Kornegay , Unknown Kornegay and others
Plaintiff:
Mario De La Fuente Manriquez and Cecilia De La Fuente
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv08144
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hallett v. Quality Loan Service Corporation et al
as 2:2011cv01659
Plaintiff:
Ted Hallett
Defendant:
Quality Loan Service Corporation, CitiBank NA, EMC Mortgage Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
King v. LVN Motors Incorporated et al
as 2:2011cv01048
Plaintiff:
Ted King
Defendant:
LVN Motors Incorporated, Van Tuyl Group Incorporated and Larry Van Tuyl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
King v. LVN Motors Incorporated et al
as 2:2011cv00733
Plaintiff:
Ted King
Defendant:
LVN Motors Incorporated and Van Tuyl Group Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Kohr v. Ryan et al
as 4:2011cv00144
Petitioner:
Ted Allen Kohr
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Diaz v. McKesson Speciality Arizona Incorporated et al
as 2:2010cv01908
Plaintiff:
Ruben J Diaz, Jr.
Defendant:
McKesson Speciality Arizona Incorporated, McKesson Specialty Distribution LLC, McKesson Specialty Pharmaceuticals LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv08077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
King v. State Bar of Arizona, Inc.
as 2:2010cv00588
Plaintiff:
Ted King
Defendant:
State Bar of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. LVN Motors, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv02155
Plaintiff:
Ted King
Defendant:
LVN Motors, Inc. and BMW Financial Services NA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
