Cases 61 - 70 of 96
Stambler v. Neiman Marcus, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv00363
Plaintiff:
Leon Stambler
Defendant:
Neiman Marcus, Inc. and Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.
Counter_claimant:
Neiman Marcus Group, Inc. and Neiman Marcus, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Leon Stambler
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Gerrard v. Neiman Marcus Group, Inc
as 2:2011cv00981
Plaintiff:
Margie Gerrard
Defendant:
Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01949
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Star Fabrics, Inc. v. The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv01474
Defendant:
Amanda Vinci, Cornerstone Apparel, Inc., D-Closet and others
Plaintiff:
Star Fabrics, Inc.
M M P Inc v. Leyendecker Los Angeles LLC et al
as 2:2010cv09340
Defendant:
BOP LLC, DV Retail Inc, Eminet Inc and others
Plaintiff:
M M P Inc
Shake Tokhmanian v. The Neiman Marcus Group Inc Long Term Disablity Plan et al
as 2:2010cv09266
Defendant:
Aetna Life Insurance Company and The Neiman Marcus Group Inc Long Term Disablity Plan
Plaintiff:
Shake Tokhmanian
The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc v. Pacific Valley Bank et al
as 3:2010cv01501
Plaintiff:
The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Pacific Valley Bank and Hearst Communications, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Parallel Networks LLC v AEO, Inc.
as 6:2010cv00275
Defendant:
AEO, Inc., AEO Management Co., Amway Corporation d/b/a Amway Global and others
Plaintiff:
Parallel Networks LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Sheila Monjazeb v. Neiman Marcus, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv03260
Defendant:
Does, Neiman Marcus Holdings, Inc., Neiman Marcus, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Sheila Monjazeb
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00841
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
