Cases 61 - 70 of 153
Hopstein et al v. Pantry, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv00077
Plaintiff:
Joe Hopstein, Sr. and Elizabeth Hopstein
Defendant:
Pantry, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Dupre Logistics L L C v. The Pantry Inc
as 6:2013cv00025
Defendant:
The Pantry Inc
Plaintiff:
Dupre Logistics L L C
Counter_claimant:
The Pantry Inc
Counter_defendant:
Dupre Logistics L L C
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
The Pantry, Inc. v. Dolce Bevuto, LLC
as 5:2012cv00764
Plaintiff:
The Pantry, Inc.
Defendant:
Dolce Bevuto, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Hoewischer v. EBB Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv01166
Plaintiff:
Norman Hoewischer
Defendant:
EBB Enterprises, Inc. and The Pantry, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Hoewischer v. Lease Investors, LLC et al
as 3:2012cv01172
Plaintiff:
Norman Hoewischer
Defendant:
Lease Investors, LLC and The Pantry, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
George v. Pantry, Inc.
as 2:2012cv02589
Plaintiff:
Janice M George
Defendant:
Pantry Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
MCMAHEL v. THE PANTRY INC
as 4:2012cv00564
Plaintiff:
GREGORY MCMAHEL
Defendant:
THE PANTRY INC
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4301 Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 1994 (USERRA)
Javaid et al v. Pantry, Inc.
as 2:2012cv02481
Plaintiff:
Zulf Javaid and Ana Javaid
Defendant:
Pantry, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Garmon v. Plaid Pantries, Inc.
as 3:2012cv01554
Plaintiff:
Justin Garmon
Defendant:
Plaid Pantries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. Hartman et al
as 2:2012cv02456
Plaintiff:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Defendant:
Dallas N. Hartman, Charles C. Conner, III, Branlyn Finnell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
