Cases 61 - 70 of 72
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2011cv00709
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Theo Deligiannis v. Deputy Kirsten Winterscheid et al
as 8:2010cv01243
Defendant:
County of Orange and Deputy Kirsten Winterscheid
Plaintiff:
Theo Deligiannis
Theo Mirani v. Lopez
as 1:2010cv00818
Petitioner:
Theo Mirani
Respondent:
Raul Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Flip Nicklin et al v. Taco Bell Corp. et al
as 2:2010cv03419
Plaintiff:
Theo Allofs, Ingo Arndt, Fred Bavendam and others
Defendant:
Snap TV, Inc., Strottman International, Inc and Taco Bell Corp.
Mirani v. Lopez
as 1:2010at00328
Petitioner:
Theo Mirani
Respondent:
Raul Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rouser v. White, et al
as 2:1993cv00767
Plaintiff:
William Rouser
Defendant:
Theo White , James Gomez , J. Yates and others
Amicu:
American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roland Eugene Horne v. Theo Lacy Mod
as 8:2008cv01064
Petitioner:
Roland Eugene Horne, Sr
Respondent:
Theo Lacy Mod
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Roland Eugene Horne v. Orange County Sheriff Department et al
as 8:2008cv00308
Plaintiff:
Roland Eugene Horne, Sr
Defendant:
Orange County Sheriff Department and All of Theo Lacy's Mode M's Deputies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gund et al v. Pilatus Aircraft, Ltd. et al
as 3:2007cv04902
Plaintiff:
George Gund, III, George Gund, III, Theo Gund and others
Defendant:
Pilatus Aircraft, Ltd., Pilatus Aircraft, Ltd., Pilatus Aircraft, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jefferson et al v. Killian et al
as 3:2007cv02992
Plaintiff:
Lillie Mae Jefferson, Betty Johnson, Gerald Patterson and others
Defendant:
Clinton Killian, Bob Connor, Arthur Burnett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
