Cases 61 - 70 of 1,052
Ray v. State of Oregon
as 6:2022cv01467
Petitioner:
Thomas Warren Ray
Respondent:
State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv01466
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ray v. State of Oregon et al
as 6:2022cv01463
Plaintiff:
Thomas Warren Ray
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Kelly J. Presley and Jason A. Steen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ard v Boyd et al
as 3:2022cv01421
Plaintiff:
Marlin Ard
Defendant:
Hilary D Boyd, Oregon State Bar, Oregon State Bar Disciplinary Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boyle v. Nelson et al
as 6:2022cv01361
Plaintiff:
Michael Boyle
Defendant:
Shane L. Nelson, Michael Hudson, Jason James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nees v. Bugher et al
as 6:2022cv01354
Plaintiff:
Myles Nees
Defendant:
Joseph Bugher, Christopher P. Digiulio, MD, Warren Roberts, MD, FAANS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2022cv01310
Plaintiff:
Carol Thomas
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
McKenzie v. Portland Police Division
as 3:2022cv01140
Plaintiff:
Thomas C. McKenzie
Defendant:
Portland Police Division, City of Portland and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Oregon Wild et al v. United States Forest Service et al
as 1:2022cv01007
Plaintiff:
Oregon Wild and WildEarth Guardians
Defendant:
United States Forest Service, Michael Ramsey, Jeannette Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
