Cases 61 - 70 of 267
QUILES v. TICE et al
as 1:2021cv01208
Petitioner:
Edwin Dolores Quiles
Respondent:
Eric Tice, The District Attorney Of The County Of Pike and The Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CARRINGTON v. TICE et al
as 2:2021cv00853
Petitioner:
ANDRE T CARRINGTON
Respondent:
ERIC TICE, ATTORNEY GENERAL PA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
QUILES v. TICE et al
as 2:2021cv03014
Petitioner:
EDWIN DOLORES QUILES
Respondent:
ERIC TICE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PIKE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PASSMORE v. TICE et al
as 3:2021cv00115
Petitioner:
JOHN PASSMORE
Respondent:
ERIC TICE, PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF BUCKS COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MCINTOSH v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2021cv00110
Respondent:
LAWRENCE S. KRASNER, JOHN E. WETZEL, ERIC TICE and others
Petitioner:
KENNAN MCINTOSH and KEENAN MCINTOSH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
NEWMAN v TICE et al
as 3:2021cv00105
Defendant:
RHU JOHN DOE, LT PRITZ, CAPT BOYCE and others
Plaintiff:
DARRYL B. NEWMAN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Moore v. Tice
as 2:2021cv02303
Defendant:
Eric Tice
Petitioner:
Hakeem Moore
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WALKER v. TICE et al
as 2:2021cv02249
Petitioner:
KHALIL WALKER
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT TICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JOHNSON v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 1:2021cv00139
Respondent:
ERIC TICE, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ERIE COUNTY
Petitioner:
JAMES EARL JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Boyd v. Tice et al
as 1:2021cv00886
Respondent:
Eric Tice and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Petitioner:
Tyrell Boyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
