Cases 61 - 70 of 99
Rogers v. Tucson, City of et al
as 4:2014cv02154
Plaintiff:
Giovannitay Cassinova Rogers
Defendant:
Tucson, City of, Tucson Police Department and Unknown Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Tucson, City of et al
as 4:2014cv02153
Plaintiff:
Giovannitay Cassinova Rogers
Defendant:
Tucson, City of, Tucson Police Department and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dawkins v. Tucson Police Department
as 4:2014cv02000
Plaintiff:
Elkino Denard Dawkins
Defendant:
Tucson Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McHugh v. Pima, County of et al
as 4:2014cv01992
Plaintiff:
Michael McHugh
Defendant:
Pima, County of , Pima County Sheriff's Department, Clarence Dupnik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Re'Voal v. Brewer et al
as 4:2014cv01793
Plaintiff:
William R Re'Voal, II
Defendant:
Janice K Brewer, Tucson Police Department, Roberto Villasenor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Dawkins v. South Tucson Police Department
as 4:2014cv00468
Plaintiff:
Elkino Denard Dawkins
Defendant:
South Tucson Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elem v. Tucson City Prosecutor's Office et al
as 4:2013cv01180
Plaintiff:
Larry Elem
Defendant:
Tucson City Prosecutor's Office and Tucson Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Congress v. Tucson, City of et al
as 4:2013cv01167
Plaintiff:
Henry A Congress
Defendant:
Tucson, City of, Tucson Police Department, Pima, County of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Romero v. Tucson, City of et al
as 4:2013cv01129
Plaintiff:
Juan Romero
Defendant:
Tucson, City of, Tucson Police Department and Ray Mechtel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
De La Cruz v. Tucson, City of et al
as 4:2013cv01115
Plaintiff:
Anna De La Cruz
Defendant:
Tucson, City of, Tucson Police Department, Ray Mechtel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
