Cases 61 - 70 of 144
Turner v. Ryan et al
as 4:2017cv00179
Petitioner:
Leonard Turner
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pouncey v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2017cv00820
Plaintiff:
Touche Jamar Pouncey
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Inmate Legal Services, C Lillie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00572
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Nickolich et al v. Arizona Community Protection and Treatment Center et al
as 2:2017cv00562
Plaintiff:
Dushan Stephan Nickolich, II, Howeard E Valentine, Clarence Brooks and others
Defendant:
Arizona Community Protection and Treatment Center, Shanda Payne, Dave Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv00285
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Melissa Turner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Turner v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv00270
Plaintiff:
William Turner
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Turner v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv00102
Plaintiff:
Carl A Turner
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Turner v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2017cv00059
Plaintiff:
Michael Aaron Turner
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio, Scott Vail, Unknown Parties and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kresl v. Turner et al
as 2:2017cv00051
Plaintiff:
John J Kresl
Defendant:
Cynthia Turner and Varian Medical Systems Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Turner v. Arizona, State of
as 4:2016cv00800
Petitioner:
Leonard Turner
Respondent:
Arizona, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
