Cases 61 - 70 of 100
Western Watersheds Project, et al v. United States Forest Service, et al
as 25-8026
Plaintiff:
WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT, ROCKY MOUNTAIN WILD and WILDEARTH GUARDIANS
Defendant:
BROOKE L. ROLLINS, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Agriculture; and UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE
Intervenor:
STATE OF WYOMING
Alliance for the Wild Rockies et al v. United States Forest Service et al
as 2:2025cv01025
Plaintiff:
Alliance for the Wild Rockies, Native Ecosystems Council, Council on Wildlife and Fish and others
Defendant:
United States Forest Service and Kevin Wright
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
URBAN SUSTAINABILITY DIRECTORS NETWORK et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE et al
as 1:2025cv01775
Plaintiff:
URBAN SUSTAINABILITY DIRECTORS NETWORK, OAKVILLE BLUEGRASS COOPERATIVE, AGROECOLOGY COMMONS and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, BROOKE ROLLINS, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE and others
Amicus Curiae:
CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION, INC.,
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Kohleriter et al v. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture et al
as 2:2025cv02446
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Kohleriter, Mary Koncel, Laura Leigh and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture, Brooke Rollins, United States Forest Service and others
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 1201 Environment: Review of Agency Action
Forest Service Employees For Environmental Ethics v. United States Forest Service et al
as 9:2025cv00066
Plaintiff:
Forest Service Employees For Environmental Ethics
Defendant:
United States Forest Service, National Marine Fisheries Service and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Brown Lopez, et al. v. United States of America, et al.
as 25-5197
Plaintiff:
GOUYEN BROWN LOPEZ, SINETTA LOPEZ, on behalf of herself and her minor child L.B., NOMIE BROWN and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, BROOKE ROLLINS and others
Intervenor:
RESOLUTION COPPER MINING, LLC
Amicus Curiae:
SACRED GROUND LEGAL SERVICES, NATIONAL NATIVE AMERICAN LAW STUDENTS ASSOCIATION, YALE NATIVE AMERICAN LAW STUDENTS ASSOCIATION and others
San Carlos Apache Tribe v. United States Forest Service, et al.
as 25-5189
Plaintiff:
SAN CARLOS APACHE TRIBE, a federally recognized Tribe
Defendant:
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, an agency in the U.S. Department of Agriculture, NEIL BOSWORTH, Supervisor of the Tonto National Forest and BROOKE ROLLINS
Intervenor:
RESOLUTION COPPER MINING, LLC
Amicus Curiae:
NATIONAL NATIVE AMERICAN LAW STUDENTS ASSOCIATION, SACRED GROUND LEGAL SERVICES, YALE NATIVE AMERICAN LAW STUDENTS ASSOCIATION and others
Arizona Mining Reform Coalition, et al. v. United States Forest Service, et al.
as 25-5185
Plaintiff:
ARIZONA MINING REFORM COALITION, INTER TRIBAL ASSOCIATION OF ARIZONA, INC., EARTHWORKS and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, an agency in the U.S. Department of Agriculture, NEIL BOSWORTH, Supervisor of the Tonto National Forest and BROOKE ROLLINS, US Secretary of Agriculture
Intervenor:
RESOLUTION COPPER MINING, LLC
Amicus Curiae:
NATIONAL NATIVE AMERICAN LAW STUDENTS ASSOCIATION, SACRED GROUND LEGAL SERVICES, YALE NATIVE AMERICAN LAW STUDENTS ASSOCIATION and others
Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Johnson et al
as 9:2025cv00136
Plaintiff:
Alliance for the Wild Rockies
Defendant:
Ben Johnson, United States Forest Service and United States Fish and Wildlife Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Yellowstone to Uintas Connection et al v. Bolling et al
as 4:2025cv00211
Plaintiff:
Alliance for the Wild Rockies and Yellowstone to Uintas Connection
Defendant:
Mel Bolling and United States Forest Service
Intervenor:
Lower Valley Energy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 181 Environment: Review of Agency Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
