Cases 61 - 70 of 645
Loudenslager v. Unilever United States Inc.
as 3:2023cv00625
Plaintiff:
Linda Loudenslager
Defendant:
Unilever United States, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Hernandez v. USA
as 3:2023cv00504
Plaintiff:
Ferdinand Hernandez
Defendant:
United States Of America and USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Simmons et al v. Unilever United States, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00491
Plaintiff:
Samantha Simmons, Ansleigh Walters, Marykay Thrower and others
Defendant:
Unilever United States, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. $4,000.00 in United States Currency
as 3:2023mc00027
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
$4,000.00 in United States Currency
Norwood v. United States Parole Commission
as 3:2023cv00411
Petitioner:
Michael Norwood
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Bidone v. United States et al
as 3:2023cv00396
Plaintiff:
Mandel Bidone
Defendant:
United States, Yale New Haven Inc., State of New York and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986 Neglect of Duty
Patel v. Warden et al
as 3:2023cv00347
Plaintiff:
Firoz Patel
Defendant:
Warden and Attorney General of the United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Zeil v. United States Department of Justice
as 3:2023cv00289
Petitioner:
Donald J. Zeil
Respondent:
United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
USA v. $2,182.00 in United States Currency et al
as 3:2023cv00271
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
$2,182.00 in United States Currency
Claimant:
Carleton Forbes
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00277
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
