Cases 61 - 70 of 15,014
Pintado Loja v. Garland
as 24-1415
Petitioner:
MERCY JOHANNA PINTADO LOJA, DAMARIS VALENTINA LOJA PINTADO and MARIA DEL CISNE LOJA PINTADO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Singh v. Garland
as 24-1416
Petitioner:
GURPREET SINGH
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Xiao-Chao v. Garland
as 24-1408
Petitioner:
ZHUO XIAO-CHAO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00542
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
Kansas, State of et al v. United States Attorney General et al
as 6:2024cv01086
Plaintiff:
Kansas, State of, Arkansas, State of, Iowa, State of and others
Defendant:
United States Attorney General, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and United States Department of Justice
Petitioner:
Ohio, State of
Amicus Curiae:
Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence, March for Our Lives, Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Reyes-Galvez v. Garland
as 24-1381
Petitioner:
ANA MARINA REYES-GALVEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Teresita Canuto v. DOJ, et al
as 24-5068
Plaintiff:
Teresita A. Canuto
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice and United States Attorney's Office
DUBOSE v. FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE et al
as 2:2024cv02101
Plaintiff:
ZUMAR DUBOSE
Defendant:
FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE, UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS OFFICE and U.S. ATTORNEY OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shalef BellIn re: Shalef Bell
as 24-1964
Petitioner:
In re: SHALEF BELL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Rivera-Reino v. Garland
as 24-1378
Petitioner:
SAUL MAURICIO RIVERA-REINO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
