Cases 61 - 70 of 234
Caruso v. Monsanto Company et al
as 1:2019cv07121
Defendant:
Russo Hardware, Inc. and Monsanto Company
Respondent:
Menard, Inc., Mac Restoration Contracting, Inc., Home Depot USA, Inc. and others
Intervenor:
University of Illinois-Chicago
Plaintiff:
Meghan Caruso
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv06271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv05226
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04961
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Santiago v. United States of America et al
as 1:2019cv03060
Defendant:
The McGaw Medical Center of Norhwestern University, an Illinois not-for-profit corporation, Kate McKenney, M.D., Adria Mora, M.D. and others
Plaintiff:
Erica Santiago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Park v. Abdullah-Span et al
as 2:2019cv02107
Plaintiff:
Hye-Young Park and Lisa Park
Defendant:
Kaamilyah Abdullah-Span, Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois, Heidi Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Todd v. Chatonda et al
as 1:2019cv02320
Defendant:
African Family in Africa, Frank Chatonda, Rosita Chatonda and others
Plaintiff:
Ethel Lee Hill Todd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02067
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02054
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
