Cases 61 - 70 of 4,155
Hill et al v. Warren Averett LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00392
Plaintiff:
Mildred Susan Hill and Bryan Hirsch
Defendant:
Warren Averett LLC, Warren Averett Companies LLC, Mary Elliott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Williams et al v. Restaurants, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Barbara Williams and Gladys Yvonne Smith
Defendant:
Piccadilly Restaurants, LLC, Piccadilly Holdings, LLC, Danny Grubbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00382
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Mitchell
as 1:2024cv00095
Petitioner:
Roderick Lee Williams
Respondent:
Phillip Mitchell
Williams v. AT&T
as 1:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Wendy M. Williams
Defendant:
AT&T
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Lucy v. Securus Technologies et al
as 1:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
William N. Lucy
Defendant:
Securus Technologies, K. Albritton, Chairman of Board of Directors of Securus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norman v. Williams et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Matthew Norman
Defendant:
Karen Williams, Ventress Correctional Facility and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bradley v. St Luke's Episcopal School
as 1:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
Arisha Williams Bradley
Defendant:
St Luke's Episcopal School
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Parrish v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2024cv00157
Petitioner:
Davey Lee Parrish
Respondent:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Alabama, State of, Etowah County Circuit Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
