Cases 61 - 70 of 575
Codale Electric Supply, Inc. v. Evans et al
as 2:2021cv00339
Defendant:
William R. Evans and SUPEPCO
Plaintiff:
Codale Electric Supply, Inc.
Cherrington et al v. Yates et al
as 2:2021cv00314
Defendant:
William M. Lloyd, Trena Sharrell Lloyd, Perry Sanders and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph C. Alamilla, Jenelle Evans Eason, Amber Cherrington and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Gabb Wireless v. Troomi Wireless et al
as 2:2021cv00253
Defendant:
Troomi Wireless and William Brady
Counter Claimant:
David L. Preece
Counter Defendant:
Gabb Wireless
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00243
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Symes et al v. Cook Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv00185
Defendant:
Cook Medical, Cook Medical Incorporated, William Cook Europe APS and others
Plaintiff:
Brad L. Symes and Peggy L. Symes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Socolov v. USA et al
as 4:2021cv00015
Plaintiff:
Oleg Socolov
Not Classified By Court:
Prisoner Litigation Unit and Correction Section (FYI)
Defendant:
William LNU and USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Biomet Orthopedics Inc et al
as 1:2021cv00011
Defendant:
Biomet Orthpedics Inc doing business as Biomet Orthopedics LLC, Biomet US Reconstruction, Biomet Orthopedics LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Annette Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Huck et al v. USA et al
as 2:2021cv00011
Plaintiff:
John Anderson and Rainer Friedrich Huck
Defendant:
William P. Pendley, Bureau of Land Management, Michael D. Nedd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
