Cases 61 - 70 of 82
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv02784
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hewlett v. United States Postal Service
as 2:2010cv01650
Plaintiff:
C Roberts Hewlett
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01528
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
rice et al v. United States Postal Service
as 2:2010cv01187
Plaintiff:
cheryl rice , tracy nagel , david nagel and others
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Patrick v. United States Postal Service et al
as 2:2010cv00650
Plaintiff:
Robert A Patrick
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and John E Potter
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791
Schipke v. Gutierrez et al
as 2:2009cv02145
Plaintiff:
Mary Elizabeth Schipke
Defendant:
Salvador Gutierrez, Randall Ybetta, United States Postal Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cox et al v. Hull et al
as 2:2009cv01986
Plaintiff:
Kevin D. Cox and Peggy Cox
Defendant:
William J. Hull, Jane Doe Hull, Robert J. Hurley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Urzua v. United States of America et al
as 3:2009cv08143
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Postal Service, Louis M. Ferraro and others
Plaintiff:
Carl R. Urzua
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Non-Motor Vehic
Fellers et al v. United States Postal Service et al
as 2:2009cv01802
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, Bill Bevelchek, Jane Doe Bevelchek and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Anthony Fellers and Joyce Ann Fellers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv01289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
