Cases 61 - 70 of 14,640
Acosta v. O'Malley
as 24-10233
Plaintiff:
Samuel Raul Acosta
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Mendoza v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 5:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Rio Mendoza
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration and Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration - Interested Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
LOCKWOOD v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv04957
Plaintiff:
KIM LOCKWOOD
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
GUADALUPE v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2024cv04982
Plaintiff:
SERGIO GUADALUPE
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Brown v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv02809
Plaintiff:
Erinn Brown
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Pica v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00151
Plaintiff:
Cecilla Pica
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Yet Classified:
General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Koepsel v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv02963
Plaintiff:
Alyssa L. Koepsel
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Reason v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv02965
Plaintiff:
Robert F. Reason
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Bradley v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00662
Plaintiff:
Ogretta Bradley
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 425 Social Security Benefits
Montes v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv02967
Plaintiff:
Adelina Montes
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
