Cases 61 - 70 of 429,340
MONSTER ENERGY COMPANY v. MONSTERZ, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00177
Plaintiff:
MONSTER ENERGY COMPANY
Defendant:
MONSTERZ, LLC and JAYGE L MARSHALL
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
ENGLISH v. DIXON
as 5:2024cv00048
Petitioner:
CORDARREL ENGLISH
Respondent:
RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WRIGHT v. DEAN
as 4:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEE WRIGHT, III
Defendant:
URSULA DEAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MONTGOMERY v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 3:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
JOHN W MONTGOMERY
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA and SECRETARY FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kuhn v. Nations Direct Mortgage, LLC
as 3:2024cv00169
Plaintiff:
Jason Kuhn
Defendant:
Nations Direct Mortgage, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
KUHN v. NATIONS DIRECT MORTGAGE LLC
as 3:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
JASON KUHN
Defendant:
NATIONS DIRECT MORTGAGE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
MATHEWS v. STREEIT et al
as 3:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
CARLTON XAVIER MATHEWS
Defendant:
J STREEIT and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. KING et al
as 4:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
JESSIE W JONES and JESSIE WIMSY JONES
Defendant:
JOSHEPH J BIDEN, WAKULLA ANNEX CORRECTION INSTITUTION SHIFT SUPERVISOR, SGT DICKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRIESTER v. HARRIS et al
as 3:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
DAVID PRIESTER, JAMES THOMAS and DAVID JACKSON
Defendant:
SCOTT S HARRIS, GRANT MALOY, EUGENE GRINBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
