Cases 61 - 70 of 59,749
Katz v. Yard House Summerlin, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00904
Plaintiff:
Daniel Benav Katz
Defendant:
Yard House Summerlin, LLC and Yard House USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Collins v. Dillard's Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00906
Plaintiff:
Teresa Collins
Defendant:
Dillard's Inc, Dillard Store Services, Inc and Dillard Investment Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00899
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00902
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Brugman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al
as 2:2024cv00888
Plaintiff:
Jacquelynn Brugman
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and Rogers Mastrangelo Carvalho & Mitchell, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Craig v. Walmart, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00892
Plaintiff:
Greta Craig
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Posey v. Facebook.com et al
as 2:2024cv00887
Plaintiff:
Anthony Posey
Defendant:
Facebook.com, Tagged.com, Cash App and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00894
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Gapasin v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2024cv00897
Petitioner:
Richard Gaspin
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons and Warden CoreCivic C. Chestnut
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Eberhardt v. McMahill et al
as 2:2024cv00901
Petitioner:
Randy Eberhardt
Respondent:
Kevin McMahill and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
