Cases 71 - 80 of 75,091
La Ronde-Bey v. Chica et al
as 3:2024cv00689
Plaintiff:
Noble Lester Keith La Ronde-Bey
Defendant:
Michael Chica, Rich P. White, Tyler Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jason Ritchwood v. Essex County Towing, et al
as 24-1727
Plaintiff:
JASON RITCHWOOD
Defendant:
ESSEX COUNTY TOWING and VILLAGE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH ORANGE
SMITH v. STRUBINGER et al
as 2:2024cv01655
Plaintiff:
ALISHA SMITH
Defendant:
SERGEANT GEOFFREY STRUBINGER, DETECTIVE THOMAS D'ALESIO and NORMA PELUYERA-ALAMO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
THEN v. HOOVER et al
as 2:2024cv01651
Plaintiff:
CARLOS THEN
Defendant:
POLICE OFFICER JASON HOOVER, POLICE OFFICER MATTHEW WALSH, POLICE OFFICER JOEY BIANCHIMANO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01654
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4301 Uniformed Srvs. Employment & Reemployment Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01634
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Katona v. Apgar et al
as 3:2024cv00677
Plaintiff:
Matthew Katona
Defendant:
Joseph Apgar, Ashley Rzesewski, Shane Schneider and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05341
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05352
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
CHESTNUT v. ACP/467 et al
as 2:2024cv01674
Plaintiff:
TARA CHESTNUT
Defendant:
ACP/467, CHIDIALDI EZENGWU, CHANELL PRATER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
