Cases 71 - 80 of 7,758
Doe #058 v. Lee et al
as 2:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
John Doe #058
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris v. Shelby County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2024cv02212
Plaintiff:
Tyler Harris
Defendant:
Shelby County, Tennessee, WellPath, LLC, Carolyn Dunlap and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Miller v. Memphis Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv02214
Plaintiff:
Joseph M. Miller
Defendant:
Memphis Police Department, CITY OF MEMPHIS, Sgt. McCaslin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
John Doe (KWS) v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00378
Plaintiff:
John Doe (KWS)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cruz v. Colby et al
as 1:2024cv02210
Plaintiff:
Jamie Cruz and Jorge Cruz
Defendant:
Colby Burmeister, West Tennessee Judicial Violent Crime and Drug Task Force for the Twenty-Eighth Judicial District, Haywood County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fontana, Sr. v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
Jimmy L. Fontana, Sr.
Defendant:
William Lee and David B Rousch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cruz v. Colby et al
as 2:2024cv02210
Plaintiff:
Jamie Cruz
Defendant:
Jorge Cruz, Brumeister Colby, West Tennessee Violent Crime and Drug Task Force for the Twenty-Eighth Judicial District and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #055 v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
John Doe #055
Defendant:
William Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Doe #056 v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
John Doe #056
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. Kerley
as 2:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Jason Michael Clark
Defendant:
Jonathan Kerley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
