Cases 71 - 80 of 141
Hammer v. Defenders Service Office / Federal Defenders Eastern District of California - United States of America
as 2:2016cv00738
Defendant:
Defenders Service Office / Federal Defenders Eastern District of California - United States of America
Plaintiff:
Brian Hammer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00703
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv02902
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Hammers v. County of Sacramento et al
as 2:2015cv01800
Plaintiff:
Joslynn Hammers and Desirae Hammers
Defendant:
County of Sacramento , Jennifer Rauzy , Seihdi Kloh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hammers v. County of Sacramento et al
as 2:2015at00905
Plaintiff:
Joslynn Hammers and Desirae Hammers
Defendant:
County of Sacramento , Jennifer Rauzy , Seihdi Kloh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Owens v. DeFazio et al
as 2:2015cv01570
Plaintiff:
Theon Owens
Defendant:
J. DeFazio, M. Brady, J. Lebeck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Borges v. City of Eureka et al
as 1:2015cv00846
Plaintiff:
Stephany Borges
Defendant:
City of Eureka, Michael Stelzig, Bryan Franco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Danforth v. Cavalry SPV I, LLC et al
as 3:2015cv00447
Plaintiff:
David Danforth
Defendant:
Cavalry SPV I, LLC and Suttell, Hammer & White, APC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
AmTrust International Underwriters Limited v. GrowLife, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv08116
Plaintiff:
AmTrust International Underwriters Limited
Defendant:
Anthony J. Ciabattoni, Craig Ellins, John Genesi and others
Gary Rotenberg v. Sterling C. Scott et al
as 2:2014cv06091
Defendant:
Anthony J. Ciabattoni, Craig Ellins, John Genesi and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Rotenberg
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
